Skip to content
TubeRank.
EsteeLauder (EL)

The call, on record

EL bullish call

Recorded from Financial Education’s public commentary. Review the evidence behind the call and its outcome.

Target range as extracted

$200–$300

AI-extracted record · awaiting moderator review. The quote is source evidence; the structured call and thesis are TubeRank’s interpretation.
Quoted text as recorded“Could this stock go back to 200 to 300 land over the next few years? Yes.”@ 14:29 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗

Our interpretation

Source published
Sep 15, 2026
Timeframe
over the next few years
Latest provider quote
$112.64As of Nov 4, 2026, 5:20 PM UTC. May be delayed; does not resolve this call.
Interpreted confidence
medium
Specificity
specific

Tracking the outcome

Status
pending
Notes
No stated deadline is available. This call remains open without a scored outcome; its horizon label is not a deadline.

How outcomes are decided · Report an error

Email me when this call is scored

We’ll email you the result of this call and of the other tracked EL calls as they resolve. No account needed.

Used only for these updates. Privacy

Evidence and source

Our summary of the thesis

Bullish

Structured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.

The host holds Estee Lauder despite it being far below its former $370 high, believing it could recover into the $200-$300 range over the next few years. He has no intention to sell under $100.

Key arguments

  • Stock previously traded near $370
  • Sees potential recovery to $200-$300 range over multiple years
  • No intention to sell under $100

Hedges and caveats (from the video)

  • Presenter acknowledges market has been sideways/choppy since May
  • Performance is portfolio-specific and may not be replicable
  • Video title promises stocks 'next to soar' but transcript does not deliver specific new predictions

About this record

Not yet reviewed by a moderator

AI-extracted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.

Source published
Sep 15, 2026, 12:30 AM UTC
First recorded by TubeRank
Sep 15, 2026, 4:22 AM UTC
Record last updated
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
Moderator review recorded
Not recorded
Transcript provenance
YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
Recorded analysis processor/source label
claude-sonnet-5
This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
Extraction pipeline version
v1.0.0
Outcome methodology version
2026-10-06.5
Outcome reason code
awaiting_stated_deadline
Publication is when the video was released; recording is when TubeRank added this call. They are not interchangeable. Legacy records can lack version and observation metadata. Dates are shown in UTC.
Recent record changes 5 shown
  1. Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.4

    After2026-10-06.5

  2. Oct 6, 2026, 5:42 AM UTC

    corrected

    Source moment (seconds)

    BeforeNot recorded

    After869

  3. Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.2

    After2026-10-06.4

  4. Oct 6, 2026, 4:01 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.1

    After2026-10-06.2

  5. Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC

    awaiting stated deadline

    Outcome methodology version

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06.1

    Reference price

    Before97.12

    AfterNot recorded

    Outcome explanation

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterNo stated deadline is available. This call remains open without a scored outcome; its horizon label is not a deadline.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterAwaiting stated deadline

Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 6 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.

Why we interpreted the confidence this way

Direct affirmative answer ('Yes') gives some conviction, but the multi-year timeframe is vague.