Skip to content
TubeRank.
Get app
Celsius (CELH)

The call, on record

CELH neutral call

Recorded from Financial Education’s public commentary. Review the evidence behind the call and its outcome.
CELHNeutralNot scored
Financial EducationFinancial Education

Target range as extracted

$27–$33

AI-extracted record · awaiting moderator review. The quote is source evidence; the structured call and thesis are TubeRank’s interpretation.
Quoted text as recorded“the best case scenario for that would be the stock stays in kind of this 27 to 33 range uh through Q1 of 2027”@ 5:09 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗

Our interpretation

Source published
Sep 9, 2026
Timeframe
through Q1 2027
Extracted deadline
Mar 31, 2027
Interpreted confidence
medium
Specificity
specific

Why this call is unscored

Status
Not scored
Notes
Neutral direction does not establish a ceiling or floor. Explicit containment semantics and supporting evidence are required before scoring.

How outcomes are decided · Report an error

Email me when CELH calls resolve

When a tracked CELH call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.

Used only for these updates. Privacy

Follow Financial Education in the iPhone appEvery CELH call on file

Evidence and source

NEW stock I bought today‼️‼️
Published on Sep 9, 2026@ 5:09Open on YouTube

Our summary of the thesis

Bullish

Structured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.

Jeremy is actively buying Celsius and wants the stock to stay cheap for as long as possible so he can accumulate more shares. He believes the Alani brand is the strongest part of the business while the core Celsius brand needs to return to growth, with upcoming beverage data and earnings serving as major catalysts.

Key arguments

  • Alani is currently the strongest growth driver for the company while the Celsius brand itself has been weak.
  • New beverage sales data in 2-3 weeks and earnings in ~2 months are major catalysts that could move the stock significantly.
  • If the Celsius brand shows signs of returning to growth, the stock could move up quickly before earnings are even reported.

Counter-arguments acknowledged

  • The stock has traded in the low-$20s in recent years and could revisit those lows.
  • If beverage data confirms continued weak growth, shares could fall to the mid-$20s or lower.

Hedges and caveats (from the video)

  • Creator acknowledges Celsius could go lower than current price based on historical price action
  • Emphasizes uncertainty about timing of price declines ('few weeks? months?')
  • Notes that past price lows don't guarantee future performance
  • Upcoming earnings identified as major market-moving event for Celsius

About this record

Not yet reviewed by a moderator

AI-extracted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.

Source published
Sep 9, 2026, 12:53 AM UTC
First recorded by TubeRank
Sep 14, 2026, 4:19 PM UTC
Record last updated
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
Moderator review recorded
Not recorded
Transcript provenance
YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
Recorded analysis processor/source label
claude-sonnet-5
This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
Extraction pipeline version
v1.0.0
Outcome methodology version
2026-10-06.5
Outcome reason code
unsupported_neutral_claim
Publication is when the video was released; recording is when TubeRank added this call. They are not interchangeable. Legacy records can lack version and observation metadata. Dates are shown in UTC.
Recent record changes 5 shown

  1. Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.4

    After2026-10-06.5

  2. Oct 6, 2026, 5:25 AM UTC

    corrected

    Source moment (seconds)

    BeforeNot recorded

    After309

  3. Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.2

    After2026-10-06.4

  4. Oct 6, 2026, 4:01 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.1

    After2026-10-06.2

  5. Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC

    unsupported neutral claim

    Outcome methodology version

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06.1

    Reference price

    Before29.56

    AfterNot recorded

    Recorded outcome date

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06

    Outcome explanation

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterNeutral direction does not establish a ceiling or floor. Explicit containment semantics and supporting evidence are required before scoring.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterUnsupported neutral claim

    Outcome status

    Beforepending

    Afterunverifiable

Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 6 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.

Methodology and limitationsReport a correction
Stored outcome evidence
Stored reference price
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded
Target as extracted
$27–$33
Stated deadline as extracted
Mar 31, 2027
Recorded outcome date
Oct 6, 2026
Outcome price observation
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded

Stored explanation

Neutral direction does not establish a ceiling or floor. Explicit containment semantics and supporting evidence are required before scoring.

Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.

Why we interpreted the confidence this way

Presented as his 'best case' desired outcome rather than a strong conviction call, but with a specific price range and timeframe.

View full video analysisView YouTuber profile