Skip to content
TubeRank.
SpaceX (SPCX)

The call, on record

SPCX bullish call

Recorded from Jo Bhakdi’s public commentary. Review the evidence behind the call and its outcome.
SPCXBullNot scored
Jo BhakdiJo Bhakdi
Imported analysis · scheduled AI source · awaiting moderator review. The quote is source evidence; the structured call and thesis are TubeRank’s interpretation.
Quoted text as recorded“So this is all insanely bullish. It is insanely bullish and yes, I am not putting any caveat on it.”@ 0:45 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗

Our interpretation

Source published
Oct 20, 2026
Stored reference price
$147.96
Interpreted confidence
high
Specificity
vague

Why this call is unscored

Status
Not scored

How outcomes are decided · Report an error

Email me when SPCX calls resolve

When a tracked SPCX call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.

Used only for these updates. Privacy

Evidence and source

IS SPACEX ACTUALLY CHEAP
Published on Oct 20, 2026@ 0:45Open on YouTube

Our summary of the thesis

Strongly Bullish

Structured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.

The speaker considers SpaceX exceptionally undervalued if its earnings projections materialize and explicitly endorses a strongly bullish investment stance. His argument uses a hypothetical $2 trillion valuation and projected $200 billion in earnings at the end of 2027 to imply a forward earnings multiple of approximately 10.

Key arguments

  • Projected earnings rise from negative levels to a $50 billion run rate within three quarters and $200 billion by the end of 2027.
  • A $2 trillion valuation against $200 billion in projected earnings implies approximately 10 times forward earnings.
  • The speaker compares that multiple with Micron and memory businesses but describes SpaceX as noncyclical.

Counter-arguments acknowledged

  • The speaker acknowledges that the projected earnings acceleration initially sounds implausible.
  • The undervaluation argument is contingent on the projections materializing.

Hedges and caveats (from the video)

  • The valuation argument depends on the projected earnings materializing.
  • The speaker explicitly declines to add a caveat to his bullish conclusion.
  • The supplied transcript ends mid-sentence.

About this record

Not yet reviewed by a moderator

Imported analysis · scheduled AI source. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.

Source published
Oct 20, 2026, 9:42 PM UTC
First recorded by TubeRank
Nov 1, 2026, 3:20 AM UTC
Record last updated
Nov 1, 2026, 3:20 AM UTC
Moderator review recorded
Not recorded
Transcript provenance
YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
Recorded analysis processor/source label
codex-cli-scheduled
This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
Submission path version
manual_v1
Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
Outcome methodology version
Not recorded; not audited under current rules
Publication is when the video was released; recording is when TubeRank added this call. They are not interchangeable. Legacy records can lack version and observation metadata. Dates are shown in UTC.
Recent record changes 1 shown
  1. Nov 1, 2026, 3:20 AM UTC

    source updated

    Recorded analysis processor/source label

    BeforeNot recorded

    Aftercodex-cli-scheduled

    Extraction or submission version

    BeforeNot recorded

    Aftermanual_v1

Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 2 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.

Stored outcome evidence
Stored reference price
$147.96
Oct 19, 2026, 11:59 PM UTC · yahoo_daily_spcx_2026
Target as extracted
Not recorded
Stated deadline as extracted
None recorded
Recorded outcome date
Not recorded
Outcome price observation
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded

Stored explanation

No explanation was recorded for this outcome.

Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.

Why we interpreted the confidence this way

Repeated emphatic bullish language and an explicit refusal to add caveats establish strong conviction.