
The call, on record
CELH bullish call
Target range as extracted
$60–
Quoted text as recorded“I think they'll that stock will bounce back huge over the next three years. And I think that stock three years from now is probably between a $60 and $90 stock in here today is 30 bucks.”@ 1:43 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Sep 4, 2026
- Timeframe
- three years from now
- Extracted deadline
- Sep 4, 2029
- Interpreted confidence
- high
- Specificity
- specific
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored: deadline
- Notes
- The stored date is not supported by an unambiguous deadline in the source quote. Horizon labels and extracted dates alone cannot establish a promised window.
Email me when CELH calls resolve
When a tracked CELH call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Our summary of the thesis
Strongly BullishStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
The host expects Celsius Holdings shares to rebound substantially over three years. He projects a $60–$90 share-price range compared with the approximately $30 price cited in the transcript.
Key arguments
- The host believes Celsius is well positioned over the next 36 months.
- The projected $60–$90 range implies substantial upside from the cited $30 share price.
Hedges and caveats (from the video)
- The million-dollar allocations are hypothetical rather than disclosed purchases.
- AMD's expected leadership is framed as the host's opinion.
- The Celsius price range is qualified with 'I think' and 'probably'.
- Meta's capital expenditures temper the host's short-term enthusiasm.
About this record
Not yet reviewed by a moderatorImported analysis · scheduled AI source. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Sep 4, 2026, 7:03 PM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Oct 6, 2026, 7:51 AM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 8:49 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Not recorded
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- codex-cli-scheduled
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- unverified_stated_deadline
Recent record changes 2 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 8:49 AM UTC
unverified stated deadline
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.5
- Reference price
Before31.61
AfterNot recorded
- Reference observation time
Before2026-09-03T23:59:59.999+00:00
AfterNot recorded
- Reference price source
Beforeyahoo_daily
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThe stored date is not supported by an unambiguous deadline in the source quote. Horizon labels and extracted dates alone cannot establish a promised window.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterUnverified stated deadline
- Outcome status
Beforepending
Afterunverifiable
Oct 6, 2026, 7:51 AM UTC
source updated
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
BeforeNot recorded
Aftercodex-cli-scheduled
- Extraction or submission version
BeforeNot recorded
Aftermanual_v1
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 3 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- $60–$90
- Stated deadline as extracted
- Sep 4, 2029
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
The stored date is not supported by an unambiguous deadline in the source quote. Horizon labels and extracted dates alone cannot establish a promised window.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.
Why we interpreted the confidence this way
Base 5 plus 2 for 'will' and 2 for a specific price range with a specific relative timeframe yields 9. 'I think' and 'probably' qualify the forecast.