Skip to content
TubeRank.
SPX

The call, on record

SPX bearish call

Recorded from Michael Tyler’s public commentary. Review the evidence behind the call and its outcome.
SPXBearNot scored
Michael TylerMichael Tyler
Submitted record · awaiting moderator review. The quote is source evidence; the structured call and thesis are TubeRank’s interpretation.
Quoted text as recorded“I think bottom line is, over the next 5 to 6 months, heading into the midterms, you are likely going to see some kind of downside for the market. Between 2 and 5% is my expectation.”

Our interpretation

Source published
May 7, 2026
Timeframe
next 5 to 6 months into the midterms
Interpreted confidence
medium
Specificity
vague

Why this call is unscored

Status
Not scored
Notes
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.

How outcomes are decided · Report an error

Email me when SPX calls resolve

When a tracked SPX call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.

Used only for these updates. Privacy

Our summary of the thesis

Mixed

Structured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.

Tyler expects a 2-5% drawdown over the next 5-6 months heading into the midterms, followed by a strong rally from October-November this year into about July 2027.

Key arguments

  • Midterm-election-year summers are the historically weakest period
  • RSI at 75 (S&P) and 80 (NDX) limits upside
  • Strong earnings season (25% vs. 14% expected) underpins post-summer rally

About this record

Not yet reviewed by a moderator

Submitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.

Source published
May 7, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
First recorded by TubeRank
May 21, 2026, 6:14 PM UTC
Record last updated
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
Moderator review recorded
Not recorded
Transcript provenance
YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
Recorded analysis processor/source label
autonomous-loop
This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
Submission path version
manual_v1
Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
Outcome methodology version
2026-10-06.5
Outcome reason code
missing_target
Publication is when the video was released; recording is when TubeRank added this call. They are not interchangeable. Legacy records can lack version and observation metadata. Dates are shown in UTC.
Recent record changes 4 shown
  1. Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.4

    After2026-10-06.5

  2. Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.2

    After2026-10-06.4

  3. Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.1

    After2026-10-06.2

  4. Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC

    missing target

    Outcome methodology version

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06.1

    Recorded outcome date

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06

    Outcome explanation

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterMissing target

Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.

Stored outcome evidence
Stored reference price
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded
Target as extracted
Not recorded
Stated deadline as extracted
None recorded
Recorded outcome date
Oct 6, 2026
Outcome price observation
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded

Stored explanation

There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.

Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.

Why we interpreted the confidence this way

Bounded magnitude (2-5%) tied to a specific seasonal window, framed as personal expectation.