The call, on record
LCID bullish call
Quoted text as recorded“Ideally, around 35 to 40,000. That would be best case scenario in my opinion given the circumstances and demand and so forth and then that way the shorts can just f off and that'll be a natural deterrent.”
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Dec 16, 2025
- Interpreted confidence
- medium
- Specificity
- vague
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored
- Notes
- There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Email me when LCID calls resolve
When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Evidence and source
Our summary of the thesis
MixedStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
Short interest is inches from all-time highs at 33.47% (vs record 33.68%) and the stock is near all-time lows simultaneously, which the host says is not a coincidence. Positive news — the Air sedan and Gravity SUV named to Car and Driver's 10 Best for 2026 — is dismissed as fluff since Lucid has a 'full shelf of awards.' The only thing that matters is 2025 production targets AND strong 2026 guidance; ideally 35-40k units, otherwise the market will remain skeptical.
Key arguments
- Short interest at 33.47% — inches from all-time high of 33.68% (both records set in December)
- Stock near all-time lows while at near all-time high short interest: not a coincidence
- Car and Driver 10 Best 2026 award: positive but insufficient as a catalyst
- 2026 guidance must be strong (ideally 35-40k units) to deter shorts
- AMP1 max capacity is 90k; AMP2 will bring it to 150k — guidance should reflect this
- Morgan Stanley sell rating with $10 price target (Dec 8) is a headwind
Counter-arguments acknowledged
- If 2025 targets are hit, short interest could normalize
- Certified pre-owned program and Car and Driver award show product quality remains strong
About this record
Reviewed by a moderatorSubmitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Dec 16, 2025, 5:03 PM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Apr 20, 2026, 5:21 PM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- manual_claude_session
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- missing_target
Recent record changes 4 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.4
After2026-10-06.5
Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.2
After2026-10-06.4
Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.1
After2026-10-06.2
Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC
missing target
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.1
- Reference price
Before11.52
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterMissing target
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- Not recorded
- Stated deadline as extracted
- None recorded
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.