Skip to content
TubeRank.
Lucid (LCID)

The call, on record

LCID bearish call

Recorded from Lucid City’s public commentary. Review the evidence behind the call and its outcome.
LCIDBearNot scored
Lucid CityLucid City
Submitted record · moderator reviewed. The quote is source evidence; the structured call and thesis are TubeRank’s interpretation.
Quoted text as recorded“I do feel they will be cutting this upcoming earnings their targets from 20,000 to realistically I can see it being around 12 in my opinion.”

Our interpretation

Source published
Jun 28, 2025
Extracted deadline
Aug 5, 2025
Interpreted confidence
medium
Specificity
specific

Why this call is unscored

Status
Not scored
Notes
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.

How outcomes are decided · Report an error

Email me when LCID calls resolve

When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.

Used only for these updates. Privacy

Our summary of the thesis

Mixed

Structured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.

With Q2 concluding imminently, the speaker frames 4,000+ as bullish and 3,500 or below as bearish for Q2 production. He estimates ~3,300 as realistic based on current data, and warns that if true, Lucid will likely cut full-year guidance from 20,000 to approximately 12,000 at August 5th earnings — an outcome the market will take very negatively.

Key arguments

  • 4,000+ Q2 production = bullish market reaction; below 3,500 = bearish
  • Speaker estimates Q2 production ~3,300 based on available sales/flyover data
  • April US sales 820, May US sales 975 (all Air, zero Gravity), June unknown
  • Q4 historically very strong for Lucid production — magical Q4 ramp pattern
  • Delivered will likely exceed produced due to massive Q2 promotions

Counter-arguments acknowledged

  • If guidance cut to 12K, market will react very negatively
  • 20K target already priced in — any miss would hurt stock significantly

About this record

Reviewed by a moderator

Submitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.

Source published
Jun 28, 2025, 2:47 PM UTC
First recorded by TubeRank
Apr 20, 2026, 5:30 PM UTC
Record last updated
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
Moderator review recorded
Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
Transcript provenance
YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
Recorded analysis processor/source label
manual_claude_session
This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
Submission path version
manual_v1
Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
Outcome methodology version
2026-10-06.5
Outcome reason code
missing_target
Publication is when the video was released; recording is when TubeRank added this call. They are not interchangeable. Legacy records can lack version and observation metadata. Dates are shown in UTC.
Recent record changes 4 shown
  1. Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.4

    After2026-10-06.5

  2. Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.2

    After2026-10-06.4

  3. Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.1

    After2026-10-06.2

  4. Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC

    missing target

    Outcome methodology version

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06.1

    Reference price

    Before21.2

    AfterNot recorded

    Recorded outcome date

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06

    Outcome explanation

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterMissing target

Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.

Stored outcome evidence
Stored reference price
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded
Target as extracted
Not recorded
Stated deadline as extracted
Aug 5, 2025
Recorded outcome date
Oct 6, 2026
Outcome price observation
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded

Stored explanation

There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.

Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.