The call, on record
LCID bullish call
Quoted text as recorded“I see this as potentially something coming very soon uh maybe tail into 2024 or sometime during 2025 for more money coming in through licensing”@ 4:23 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Sep 21, 2024
- Extracted deadline
- Dec 31, 2025
- Interpreted confidence
- low
- Specificity
- vague
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored
- Notes
- There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Email me when LCID calls resolve
When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Our summary of the thesis
BullishStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
Recent reporting confirms Lucid VP stated the company is in licensing talks with 'many automakers' - a shift from earlier production partnership speculation to a cleaner licensing model. The Michigan office opening near major OEM HQs (Ford, GM, etc.) and hiring 262 engineers signals active deal-making. The speaker's biggest takeaway from the Tech/Manufacturing Day was that no major OEMs had yet lined up for licensing - now that appears to be changing. The speaker sees this as a potential major 2024/2025 catalyst.
Key arguments
- VP confirmed licensing talks with 'many automakers' - cleaner revenue model than production partnerships
- Michigan office opening near major OEM headquarters with 262 skilled engineering hires
- Hyundai CEO reportedly visited Lucid HQ this year, fueling partnership speculation
- Tech/Manufacturing Day success likely attracted multiple OEM interest
- Licensing = 'free money' - capital-light revenue stream to supplement vehicle sales
Counter-arguments acknowledged
- Shorts increased 3.45M on Friday despite positive news - they may know something
- Licensing deal could still be tail-end 2024 or 2025, not immediate
About this record
Reviewed by a moderatorSubmitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Sep 21, 2024, 2:10 PM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Apr 20, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- manual_claude_session
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- missing_target
Recent record changes 4 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.4
After2026-10-06.5
Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.2
After2026-10-06.4
Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.1
After2026-10-06.2
Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC
missing target
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.1
- Reference price
Before34.9
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterMissing target
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- Not recorded
- Stated deadline as extracted
- Dec 31, 2025
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.