The call, on record
LCID bearish call
Quoted text as recorded“every time it's broken below that on average it goes down roughly around 25% so something to definitely keep in mind”@ 7:36 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Jan 13, 2025
- Interpreted confidence
- medium
- Specificity
- vague
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored
- Notes
- There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Email me when LCID calls resolve
When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Evidence and source
Our summary of the thesis
MixedStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
NASDAQ's official disclosure reveals 53M short shares were returned between Dec 13 and Dec 31 (dropping from 265.7M to 212.5M), which did drive the Dec 13-31 rally from $2.58 to $3.02 — but disappointingly no short squeeze materialized. Shorts have since re-added aggressively in January, and the stock is now trading below both 100 and 200-day MAs with the super trend and 50-day MA at $2.62 as the last defense. Q4 earnings on February 25 with -$0.27 EPS consensus and $206M revenue estimate is the critical upcoming catalyst. The speaker emphasizes asking management quality questions about 2025 production targets and Gravity guidance rather than profitability.
Key arguments
- 53M short shares returned Dec 13-31 explains rally but failed to trigger squeeze — disappointing
- Stock broke below 100 and 200-day MAs — only super trend ($2.62) and 50-day MA remain as support
- Historical pattern: 50-day MA break leads to ~25% decline (consistent across multiple episodes since 2021)
- Q4 earnings catalyst: market wants 2025 production guidance and Gravity mix targets, not EPS details
Counter-arguments acknowledged
- Big money buying the dip per secondary market data — fundamental buyers still present
- Stock very oversold — kickass earnings could reverse the technical breakdown quickly
About this record
Reviewed by a moderatorSubmitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Jan 13, 2025, 4:28 PM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Apr 20, 2026, 5:36 PM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- manual_claude_session
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- missing_target
Recent record changes 4 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.4
After2026-10-06.5
Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.2
After2026-10-06.4
Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.1
After2026-10-06.2
Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC
missing target
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.1
- Reference price
Before30.1
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterMissing target
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- Not recorded
- Stated deadline as extracted
- None recorded
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.