Skip to content
TubeRank.
Tesla (TSLA)

The call, on record

TSLA neutral call

Recorded from Curious Pejjy’s public commentary. Review the evidence behind the call and its outcome.
TSLANeutralNot scored
Curious PejjyCurious Pejjy
Imported analysis · scheduled AI source · awaiting moderator review. The quote is source evidence; the structured call and thesis are TubeRank’s interpretation.
Quoted text as recorded“486,000 and a half will give us an EPS of 39 cents.”@ 39:33 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗

Our interpretation

Source published
Oct 2, 2026
Timeframe
Q3 2026 earnings
Interpreted confidence
medium
Specificity
specific

Why this call is unscored

Status
Not scored
Notes
Neutral direction does not establish a ceiling or floor. Explicit containment semantics and supporting evidence are required before scoring.

How outcomes are decided · Report an error

Email me when TSLA calls resolve

When a tracked TSLA call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.

Used only for these updates. Privacy

Evidence and source

Our summary of the thesis

Strongly Bullish

Structured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.

The host views FSD adoption and robotaxi deployment as more important to Tesla's long-term value than quarterly vehicle deliveries alone. He remains committed to accumulating shares and holding through 2030, while acknowledging disappointing energy deployments and uncertainty around near-term profitability.

Key arguments

  • The reported 486,532 vehicle deliveries beat the consensus figures discussed during the stream.
  • More vehicles on the road create a larger potential customer base for recurring FSD subscriptions.
  • The host's observations in Toronto suggest increasing FSD usage.
  • International FSD availability could expand subscription adoption.
  • Robotaxi fleet expansion could create additional revenue and support higher margins.
  • Energy deployments could rebound as projects and additional production capacity come online.
  • The host's preliminary earnings model projects approximately $28.9 billion in revenue and a roughly 3% operating margin.

Counter-arguments acknowledged

  • Reported energy deployments of 13.7 GWh missed the 15.9 GWh expectation discussed in the stream.
  • Operating expenses and compensation-related costs could constrain profit growth.
  • The host lacks sufficient geographic FSD subscription data to model revenue confidently.
  • United States demand and utilization at Fremont and Texas may be weaker than at Berlin and Shanghai.
  • Tesla's stock performance has lagged some alternative investments.
  • Vehicle deliveries remain a major contributor to revenue despite the emphasis on autonomy.

Hedges and caveats (from the video)

  • The host describes buying below $400 as his opinion and adds that it is not financial advice.
  • Energy storage is a lumpy business, making quarterly deployments uneven.
  • His earnings model is preliminary and requires refinement.
  • Operating costs, including costs associated with Elon Musk's compensation, could reduce earnings.
  • The cited 55% FSD take rate applies to the United States or North America, not globally.
  • He acknowledges weaker United States vehicle sales and possible production or supply-chain constraints.
  • He acknowledges that investing in other stocks could have produced stronger returns.

About this record

Not yet reviewed by a moderator

Imported analysis · scheduled AI source. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.

Source published
Oct 2, 2026, 1:51 PM UTC
First recorded by TubeRank
Oct 3, 2026, 2:01 AM UTC
Record last updated
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
Moderator review recorded
Not recorded
Transcript provenance
YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
Recorded analysis processor/source label
codex-cli-scheduled
This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
Submission path version
manual_v1
Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
Outcome methodology version
2026-10-06.5
Outcome reason code
unsupported_neutral_claim
Publication is when the video was released; recording is when TubeRank added this call. They are not interchangeable. Legacy records can lack version and observation metadata. Dates are shown in UTC.
Recent record changes 6 shown
  1. Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.4

    After2026-10-06.5

  2. Oct 6, 2026, 5:32 AM UTC

    corrected

    Source moment (seconds)

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2373

  3. Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC

    unsupported neutral claim

    Outcome methodology version

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06.4

    Recorded outcome date

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06

    Outcome explanation

    Before[source-fields-2026-10-06.2] Removed a reporting-period end that had been stored as a future prediction deadline. The quoted forecast concerns company metrics; the original reporting-period wording is retained, but an earnings announcement deadline is not established by this quote.

    AfterNeutral direction does not establish a ceiling or floor. Explicit containment semantics and supporting evidence are required before scoring.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeSource fields corrected pending revalidation

    AfterUnsupported neutral claim

  4. Oct 6, 2026, 5:11 AM UTC

    source fields corrected pending revalidation

    Stated deadline

    Before2026-09-30

    AfterNot recorded

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.2

    AfterNot recorded

    Recorded outcome date

    Before2026-10-06

    AfterNot recorded

    Outcome explanation

    BeforeThe recorded deadline precedes the source publication; no future prediction window exists.

    After[source-fields-2026-10-06.2] Removed a reporting-period end that had been stored as a future prediction deadline. The quoted forecast concerns company metrics; the original reporting-period wording is retained, but an earnings announcement deadline is not established by this quote.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeDeadline before publication

    AfterSource fields corrected pending revalidation

  5. Oct 6, 2026, 4:01 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.1

    After2026-10-06.2

  6. Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC

    deadline before publication

    Outcome methodology version

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06.1

    Reference price

    Before354.11

    AfterNot recorded

    Recorded outcome date

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06

    Outcome explanation

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterThe recorded deadline precedes the source publication; no future prediction window exists.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterDeadline before publication

Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 7 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.

Stored outcome evidence
Stored reference price
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded
Target as extracted
Not recorded
Stated deadline as extracted
None recorded
Recorded outcome date
Oct 6, 2026
Outcome price observation
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded

Stored explanation

Neutral direction does not establish a ceiling or floor. Explicit containment semantics and supporting evidence are required before scoring.

Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.

Why we interpreted the confidence this way

The word 'will' strengthens conviction, but the estimate depends on preliminary operating-cost and FSD assumptions. The EPS figure is not a stock-price target.