The call, on record
LCID neutral call
Quoted text as recorded“I do feel that it should be either stagnant, if not a little bit higher. So, possibly right above this S1.”@ 8:08 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Dec 21, 2025
- Extracted deadline
- Dec 26, 2025
- Interpreted confidence
- medium
- Specificity
- vague
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored: condition
- Notes
- The claim contains a condition. Its trigger has not been verified, so price alone cannot establish an outcome.
Email me when LCID calls resolve
When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Evidence and source
Our summary of the thesis
MixedStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
The stock is at all-time high short interest (33.9%, 44.18M shares) and technically weak, but $17.48M in unusual after-hours institutional buys on Friday ($13.8M, $1.3M, $1.2M, $1.09M) and Jim Cramer's sell recommendation (historically a contrarian buy signal) provide some bullish intrigue. The host sees the week as likely stagnant/slightly higher, with $14+ only possible once Lucid officially confirms hitting its 2025 production targets in 2-3 weeks.
Key arguments
- Unusual $17.48M in after-hours buys may signal anticipation of news
- Jim Cramer's sell call is a historical contrarian bullish indicator
- Short interest at all-time highs: 33.9% float (44.18M shares)
- Stock is at new all-time lows and technically very weak
- No $14+ move without official confirmation of 2025 production target hit
- Options consensus: bulls see $12.50-13, bears see sub $11.11 for the week
Counter-arguments acknowledged
- Low volume holiday week limits upside potential
- Bank of America gave $10 price target downgrade on Dec 10
About this record
Reviewed by a moderatorSubmitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Dec 21, 2025, 2:01 PM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Apr 20, 2026, 5:20 PM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- manual_claude_session
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- unverified_condition
Recent record changes 4 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.4
After2026-10-06.5
Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.2
After2026-10-06.4
Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.1
After2026-10-06.2
Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC
unverified condition
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.1
- Reference price
Before12.3
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThe claim contains a condition. Its trigger has not been verified, so price alone cannot establish an outcome.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterUnverified condition
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- Not recorded
- Stated deadline as extracted
- Dec 26, 2025
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
The claim contains a condition. Its trigger has not been verified, so price alone cannot establish an outcome.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.