The call, on record
LCID bullish call
Quoted text as recorded“I think right now Lucid being a full American company at least on paper technically they are able to bypass allw of those tariffs so technically Lucid is in a very good position”@ 4:32 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Jun 15, 2024
- Extracted deadline
- Jun 30, 2025
- Interpreted confidence
- medium
- Specificity
- vague
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored
- Notes
- There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Email me when LCID calls resolve
When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Evidence and source
Our summary of the thesis
BullishStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
The speaker makes the speculative case that Lucid and Hyundai are likely in advanced partnership talks, as the rumor pattern mirrors the Aston Martin deal (rumored February 2023, announced August 2023). Lucid has the technology but not the production capacity — Hyundai has massive production capacity. A deal could involve Hyundai building vehicles using Lucid tech (potentially in Saudi Arabia), similar to how the Ceará-Hyundai tech deal totaled $2.18B. This would radically change Lucid's production trajectory.
Key arguments
- Aston Martin deal took 6 months from rumor to announcement — Hyundai rumors now active
- Lucid needs production scale: CEO stated goal of 1M+ annual midsize SUVs, impossible with AMP1+AMP2 alone
- Hyundai produced 369,000 vehicles in the US alone — production partner would immediately solve scale problem
- PIF has a separate Chinese low-cost EV joint venture — three-tier strategy (Aston Martin luxury, Lucid mid, Chinese entry) is possible
- Ceará-Hyundai tech deal precedent: $2.18B for technology rights — Lucid's tech is similarly valuable
- Lucid's US NASDAQ listing preserves American company status — bypasses tariffs unlike Chinese producers
Counter-arguments acknowledged
- Partnership negotiations between three entities (Lucid, Hyundai, and potentially Ceara) will take a long time
- Initial deal may require Lucid to pay Hyundai production costs rather than receive payment
About this record
Reviewed by a moderatorSubmitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Jun 15, 2024, 1:33 PM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Apr 20, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- manual_claude_session
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- missing_target
Recent record changes 4 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.4
After2026-10-06.5
Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.2
After2026-10-06.4
Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.1
After2026-10-06.2
Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC
missing target
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.1
- Reference price
Before25.2
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterMissing target
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- Not recorded
- Stated deadline as extracted
- Jun 30, 2025
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.