The call, on record
LCID bullish call
Quoted text as recorded“you could see anywhere from like I said a 20 to 60% run on average roughly 40”@ 1:59 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Dec 14, 2024
- Interpreted confidence
- medium
- Specificity
- vague
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored
- Notes
- There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Email me when LCID calls resolve
When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Evidence and source
Our summary of the thesis
BullishStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
For the first time in its trading history since 2021, Lucid has closed four consecutive weeks in the green. When combined with closing above the 50-day moving average for two consecutive days — a historically rare event with only five prior occurrences — the stock has typically rallied 25-60% (averaging ~40%). Institutional buying across two quarters and bullish options reinforce the case.
Key arguments
- First ever four-consecutive-week green close in Lucid's entire public trading history since 2021
- Only 5-6 instances of closing above the 50-day MA for two consecutive days; each resulted in 25-60% average rally
- Institutions have been net buyers for two consecutive quarters per 13F filings
- Gravity SUV demand and upcoming partnerships could sustain momentum above $3
- Stock may never revisit the $1.80-1.93 all-time low range again
Counter-arguments acknowledged
- Lucid has faked out similar setups before and then dwindled lower
- Recent dilution killed previous breakout momentum
About this record
Reviewed by a moderatorSubmitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Dec 14, 2024, 2:45 PM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Apr 20, 2026, 5:42 PM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- manual_claude_session
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- missing_target
Recent record changes 4 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.4
After2026-10-06.5
Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.2
After2026-10-06.4
Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.1
After2026-10-06.2
Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC
missing target
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.1
- Reference price
Before25.8
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterMissing target
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- Not recorded
- Stated deadline as extracted
- None recorded
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.