The call, on record
LCID bullish call
Quoted text as recorded“historically roughly about like a 30 to 40% push higher so there is uh like I said I'm cautiously optimistic”@ 6:59 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗
Our interpretation
- Source published
- Dec 13, 2024
- Interpreted confidence
- medium
- Specificity
- vague
Why this call is unscored
- Status
- Not scored
- Notes
- There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Email me when LCID calls resolve
When a tracked LCID call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.
Used only for these updates. Privacy
Evidence and source
Our summary of the thesis
BullishStructured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.
Lucid rose 4.53% driven primarily by algorithmic trading after breaking above the key $2.47 super-trend level. Peter Rawlinson's Bloomberg interview gave multiple Easter eggs hinting at upcoming OEM partnerships and potential solid-state battery development. Options consensus has expanded from $3 to $3.50 and $4 targets, with February-March options showing $5+ expectations.
Key arguments
- Stock broke above $2.47 super-trend level, triggering algorithmic buying programs
- Peter Rawlinson's Bloomberg interview hinted at European OEM partnerships with economies-of-scale licensing
- Options premiums growing daily ($1.2M, $2.7M, $2.1M in consecutive days) showing increasing institutional conviction
- Bears anticipate sub-$2.50 short-term but even that implies more upside than downside
- Q4 earnings options show $5+ consensus for February, implying strong delivery expectations
Counter-arguments acknowledged
- Shorts returned 559K shares — abnormal vs. other heavily-shorted stocks on a green market day
- Lucid has faked out breakout attempts before; needs two consecutive days above 50-day MA to confirm
About this record
Reviewed by a moderatorSubmitted record. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.
- Source published
- Dec 13, 2024, 4:13 AM UTC
- First recorded by TubeRank
- Apr 20, 2026, 5:43 PM UTC
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
- Moderator review recorded
- Apr 26, 2026, 9:32 AM UTC
- Transcript provenance
- YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
- Recorded analysis processor/source label
- manual_claude_session
- This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
- Submission path version
- manual_v1
- Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
- Outcome methodology version
- 2026-10-06.5
- Outcome reason code
- missing_target
Recent record changes 4 shown
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.4
After2026-10-06.5
Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.2
After2026-10-06.4
Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC
corrected
- Outcome methodology version
Before2026-10-06.1
After2026-10-06.2
Oct 6, 2026, 3:27 AM UTC
missing target
- Outcome methodology version
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06.1
- Reference price
Before25.8
AfterNot recorded
- Recorded outcome date
BeforeNot recorded
After2026-10-06
- Outcome explanation
BeforeNot recorded
AfterThere is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
- Outcome reason
BeforeNot recorded
AfterMissing target
Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 5 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.
Stored outcome evidence
- Stored reference price
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
- Target as extracted
- Not recorded
- Stated deadline as extracted
- None recorded
- Recorded outcome date
- Oct 6, 2026
- Outcome price observation
- Not recorded
- Not recorded · provider not recorded
Stored explanation
There is no numerical target that can be objectively scored.
Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.