Ticker archive
What was said about United States Oil Fund (Oil Price Proxy)
This is the TubeRank file on USO. Price calls from finance YouTube are kept here with the original quote, then checked against the market once their window closes. Read it the way you would a research notebook.
USOUnited States Oil Fund (Oil Price Proxy)
$144.08as of 10h ago
The record, in brief
20 calls from 4 channels are on file for USO. None have resolved yet, so there is no hit rate to report. 2 are still pending. The record leans bullish: 12 bullish and 8 bearish.
- On file
- 20
- Hit rate
- —
- Pending
- 2
- Channels
- 4
recorded calls
nothing resolved yet
awaiting a result
12 bullish · 8 bearish
Targets against the price
Each dot is a call with a target and a video date, drawn against the recorded price. Open one for the quote and how it resolved.
- pending
- unverifiable
Left off the chart: 18 without a target or a video date. They remain in the list below.
Calls, by channel
Grouped by who said it. The latest thesis is written out; open a channel for the calls we kept, newest first.
Meet Kevin8 callsBullishKevin argues that escalating conflicts involving Iran, the Houthis, Saudi Arabia, and Russia/Ukraine (including strikes on Aramco facilities and Moscow refineries) are disrupting global oil supply, which he believes will push oil prices sharply higher in the near term. He frames the weekend's attacks as a leading indicator for oil markets heading into the week.
Kevin argues that escalating conflicts involving Iran, the Houthis, Saudi Arabia, and Russia/Ukraine (including strikes on Aramco facilities and Moscow refineries) are disrupting global oil supply, which he believes will push oil prices sharply higher in the near term. He frames the weekend's attacks as a leading indicator for oil markets heading into the week.
Earlier theses (7)
Kevin believes oil prices have found a near-term floor around $107 a barrel following the Saudi pipeline pumping-facility strikes, suggesting limited further downside for crude in the near term.
Kevin argues that a confluence of attacks on the East-West pipeline, Houthi control of the Red Sea, and peak rate-hike fears has pushed oil prices to a near-term peak, but he expects a pre-election Iran deal to bring oil prices back down. He frames this as bullish for the broader market even though it implies a near-term drop in oil prices.
Kevin argues that the escalating US-Iran conflict, including strikes near the Strait of Hormuz and disrupted tanker traffic, is pushing oil prices higher and that this kind of geopolitical shock is typically a buying opportunity. He notes Brent crude has already risen to $94 from $92 amid the strikes and warns this could persist as the conflict evolves.
Kevin believes oil and refined product prices will stay elevated for longer due to escalating Middle East conflict, low inventories, and constrained refining capacity. He cites a Goldman Sachs note pointing to higher diesel and product margins persisting due to more frequent outages and lower stockpiles.
The host argues that ongoing tension around the Iran/Strait of Hormuz situation is keeping oil prices elevated near recent highs, which he expects to persist or worsen and feed through into higher Treasury yields and tighter AI financing conditions. He notes Brent has climbed back near $92 after briefly falling to the low $70s post-ceasefire.
Kevin argues that rising geopolitical risk from potential US nuclear strategy shifts and an escalating standoff with Iran, combined with a weakening alliance structure (South Korea, Oman), will keep oil prices elevated for longer. He expects crude to climb into the $90s in the near term as the conflict shows no sign of resolution.
Kevin argues that Treasury Secretary Bessent's forthcoming economic isolation plan against Iran, combined with possible secondary sanctions on China and India and a continued blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, will keep oil supply constrained and push oil prices higher for longer, fueling structural inflation. He frames this as a new inflationary risk layered on top of existing tensions in the Caspian Sea and Red Sea shipping routes.
“Well, if this weekend is any guide, oil prices are about to skyrocket.”
“To me the worst case of oil is 107 at least in near-term figures.”
“I think there is a more like cumulative 80% chance that we get some kind of positive outlook on Iran between now and the election. That dri…”
“What does this mean for us? Well, as usual, it means oil higher for longer.”
“I think we're going to have to unfortunately live with these higher oil prices for longer.”
“If this Iran situation keeps going on, then we expect oil prices to continue to stay elevated and rise more and more and more and that feed…”
“I think we're going to get into the '9s pretty soon because there's really no end to how long this war is going.”
“reintroducing rate risks, the bare steepener continuing past shock territory, pushing oil into the '9s.”
Michael Tyler7 callsBearishTyler argues elevated oil prices above $100 a barrel are being driven by the Iran war, and that he expects the U.S. to eventually withdraw similar to the Korean War outcome, allowing Iran to reopen the Strait and oil to 'flow again,' which would ease prices. He is uncertain about timing, saying it could happen next week or next year.
Tyler argues elevated oil prices above $100 a barrel are being driven by the Iran war, and that he expects the U.S. to eventually withdraw similar to the Korean War outcome, allowing Iran to reopen the Strait and oil to 'flow again,' which would ease prices. He is uncertain about timing, saying it could happen next week or next year.
Earlier theses (6)
The host is bullish on oil prices, citing the East-West pipeline shutdown, Saudi supply cuts to European refiners, and Libyan/Kazakh outages as reasons crude is spiking toward new highs. He notes this is partly a self-reinforcing fear loop as companies buy futures to lock in supply.
The host believes oil prices will keep climbing due to the ongoing Iran war and Houthi threats to the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which is a key driver of expected Fed rate hikes. He sees this oil price rise as an ongoing risk into the winter months.
The speaker highlights oil prices approaching $100 per barrel, driven by Houthi advances toward the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait and falling Saudi production, and expects the supply squeeze to continue. He frames rising oil as a key driver of inflation pressure and market risk.
The host suggests that if the Iran war ends and the Strait of Hormuz reopens, oil prices would fall, easing inflation pressure and reducing the odds of a Fed rate hike. This is discussed as a macro side-effect rather than a standalone oil trading thesis.
Tyler ties near-term oil price direction to the Iran conflict, arguing that an end to the war would cause a sharp, fast drop in oil prices and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, easing inflation pressure and reducing the odds of a Fed rate hike. He also discusses a new US-Venezuela oil deal that could add supply long-term but says it won't move prices immediately.
The host ties oil prices to the outcome of the Iran conflict, suggesting oil falls if the war ends and the Strait of Hormuz reopens, which would also reduce pressure on the Fed to hike rates.
“Oil is going to flow again and that is how this is going to end.”
“This thing is skyrocketing soon to be at new highs.”
“Oil is close to $100 a barrel with no signs of stopping. And as we get into winter months, this is going to be an even bigger problem.”
“oil is almost $100 with no sign of stopping.”
“you're not going to get a correction... because oil would fall, the odds of rate hikes would plummet, inflation expectations would plummet”
“If the war with Iran did end, oil's going to plummet 10, 15, 20% that day.”
“You're going to open the straight of moose, oil's going to fall, the Fed's not going to need to hike rates, stocks are going to rip.”
Randy Kirk3 callsBearishRandy Kirk believes crude oil is topping out in its current trading range and decides to sell calls on USO to position for limited further upside.
Randy Kirk believes crude oil is topping out in its current trading range and decides to sell calls on USO to position for limited further upside.
Earlier theses (2)
The speakers note West Texas Intermediate crude approaching $100 a barrel amid Middle East tensions, and argue futures pricing suggests oil will decline only gradually rather than crash after the election or a ceasefire.
The speaker argues that despite geopolitical noise around supply disruptions (e.g., the Strait), oil supply chains find ways around restrictions, so current prices are inflated. He believes oil is overpriced at its current level and should be trading lower.
“It's topping out, I think. I'm going to sell calls on USO.”
“I mean, that's not what the futures markets are saying. They're saying it's going to be a more gradual decline.”
“I go back to the it's $82.50 for oil. Should be $60.”
Jo Bhakdi2 callsBullishThe YouTuber predicts oil prices will surge due to the US blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, creating a dual blockade situation with Iran. He views this as worse than the worst-case scenario for oil markets.
The YouTuber predicts oil prices will surge due to the US blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, creating a dual blockade situation with Iran. He views this as worse than the worst-case scenario for oil markets.
Earlier thesis (1)
The speaker believes the Iran war will end soon due to political pressures on the Trump administration, which would prevent oil prices from exploding. He argues that continuing the war would be politically disastrous for Republicans and economically damaging, making a quick resolution likely.
“My prediction would be that oil goes through the roof because this is a total hammer here.”
“And if they end the war soon, I think the stock market is going to ready like crazy. Not so much because they're so happy that the war is o…”