Skip to content
TubeRank.
Tesla (TSLA)

The call, on record

TSLA bullish call

Recorded from Michael Tyler’s public commentary. Review the evidence behind the call and its outcome.
TSLABullNot scored: deadline
Michael TylerMichael Tyler

Target Price

$392

Imported analysis · scheduled AI source · awaiting moderator review. The quote is source evidence; the structured call and thesis are TubeRank’s interpretation.
Quoted text as recorded“It looks like baby you are on track to test that 392 level tomorrow, the day after that at this pace.”@ 21:34 · open at this moment on YouTube ↗

Our interpretation

Source published
Oct 5, 2026
Timeframe
tomorrow or the day after that
Extracted deadline
Oct 6, 2026
Interpreted confidence
medium
Specificity
specific

Why this call is unscored

Status
Not scored: deadline
Notes
The stored date is not supported by an unambiguous deadline in the source quote. Horizon labels and extracted dates alone cannot establish a promised window.

How outcomes are decided · Report an error

Email me when TSLA calls resolve

When a tracked TSLA call is scored — hit, miss or partial — we’ll email you the result. No account needed.

Used only for these updates. Privacy

Evidence and source

Our summary of the thesis

Strongly Bullish

Structured interpretation of the video, not a verbatim quotation. Check the source for conditions, emphasis and context.

The host sees Tesla's rebound above its 100-day moving average as setting up a near-term test of $392 and a conditional move toward $450 if it clears its 200-day moving average. He supports this view with strong German registrations, expanding Berlin production, positive institutional options activity, and short covering.

Key arguments

  • Tesla has broken above its 100-day moving average after several strong sessions.
  • German registrations rose sharply and Berlin production is increasing.
  • The host describes Tesla's fundamentals as firing on all cylinders.
  • Institutional options activity shows a higher positive order-value share.
  • Short sellers are covering despite a substantial recent share-price rise.
  • Lower Treasury yields could reduce subsidized financing costs and benefit margins.

Counter-arguments acknowledged

  • The $450 move requires a break above the 200-day moving average.
  • Higher yields pressure financing economics and valuation.
  • UBS reports an energy-deployment miss that could weigh on earnings.
  • The war with Iran and subsequent rate expectations could determine Tesla's year-end performance.

Hedges and caveats (from the video)

  • Treasury yields could continue rising, and the timing of a peak is unknown.
  • The host becomes more cautious from mid-November through year-end because military escalation could increase oil prices and rate-hike expectations.
  • A Treasury intervention is conditional on continued bond-market stress.
  • Tesla's move toward $450 depends on clearing its 200-day moving average.
  • Tesla subsidizes vehicle financing costs; lower yields would improve this burden.
  • UBS's neutral rating and energy-deployment miss are reported without endorsement of its $385 target.
  • The host says his concentrated, fully invested portfolio is not a recommendation or financial advice.

About this record

Not yet reviewed by a moderator

Imported analysis · scheduled AI source. A quote, summary and outcome each need their own context. Moderator review does not certify investment performance.

Source published
Oct 5, 2026, 8:00 PM UTC
First recorded by TubeRank
Oct 6, 2026, 3:40 AM UTC
Record last updated
Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC
Moderator review recorded
Not recorded
Transcript provenance
YouTube captions (manual or automatic)
Recorded analysis processor/source label
codex-cli-scheduled
This can identify a workflow rather than an exact AI model version.
Submission path version
manual_v1
Identifies the precomputed submission path. It does not identify an AI model version or imply human authorship.
Outcome methodology version
2026-10-06.5
Outcome reason code
unverified_stated_deadline
Publication is when the video was released; recording is when TubeRank added this call. They are not interchangeable. Legacy records can lack version and observation metadata. Dates are shown in UTC.
Recent record changes 6 shown
  1. Oct 6, 2026, 6:32 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.4

    After2026-10-06.5

  2. Oct 6, 2026, 5:39 AM UTC

    corrected

    Source moment (seconds)

    BeforeNot recorded

    After1294

  3. Oct 6, 2026, 5:14 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.2

    After2026-10-06.4

  4. Oct 6, 2026, 4:01 AM UTC

    corrected

    Outcome methodology version

    Before2026-10-06.1

    After2026-10-06.2

  5. Oct 6, 2026, 3:45 AM UTC

    unverified stated deadline

    Outcome methodology version

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06.1

    Recorded outcome date

    BeforeNot recorded

    After2026-10-06

    Outcome explanation

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterThe stored date is not supported by an unambiguous deadline in the source quote. Horizon labels and extracted dates alone cannot establish a promised window.

    Outcome reason

    BeforeNot recorded

    AfterUnverified stated deadline

    Outcome status

    Beforepending

    Afterunverifiable

  6. Oct 6, 2026, 3:40 AM UTC

    source updated

    Recorded analysis processor/source label

    BeforeNot recorded

    Aftercodex-cli-scheduled

    Extraction or submission version

    BeforeNot recorded

    Aftermanual_v1

Showing up to 20 recent changes. The complete feed has 7 recorded events for this call, including its initial entry. Read the full paginated history (JSON); follow nextCursor while hasMore is true.

Stored outcome evidence
Stored reference price
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded
Target as extracted
$392
Stated deadline as extracted
Oct 6, 2026
Recorded outcome date
Oct 6, 2026
Outcome price observation
Not recorded
Not recorded · provider not recorded

Stored explanation

The stored date is not supported by an unambiguous deadline in the source quote. Horizon labels and extracted dates alone cannot establish a promised window.

Missing timestamps, providers and versions are historical gaps. Stored observations can include daily closes; they do not show every intraday touch or prove an executable trade. Read the methodology.

Why we interpreted the confidence this way

Base 5 plus 2 for a specific price and specific date, minus 1 for the financial-advice disclaimer yields 6. 'It looks like' and 'at this pace' further qualify the forecast.